Σε συζήτηση σε άλλο φόρουμ είχα επιμείνει ότι αυτό το είδος διαζυγίου δεν είναι ίδιο με το συναινετικό διαζύγιο. Τότε δεν έβρισκες πολλούς να μιλάνε για διαζύγιο χωρίς υπαιτιότητα των συζύγων, τώρα υπάρχουν αρκετές σελίδες.
https://www.google.com/search?q="διαζύγιο χωρίς υπαιτιότητα"
Η περιγραφή στη Wikipedia:
No-fault divorce is a divorce in which the dissolution of a marriage does not require a showing of wrong-doing by either party. Laws providing for no-fault divorce allow a family court or other court to grant a divorce in response to a petition by either party to the marriage, without requiring the petitioner to provide evidence that the respondent has committed a breach of the marital contract. Laws providing for no-fault divorce also often limit the potential legal defenses of a respondent who would prefer to remain married.
Το συναινετικό διαζύγιο είναι divorce by mutual consent ή mutual consent divorce και βλέπω ότι, εκτός από εμάς, το έχουν οι Ινδοί, τουλάχιστον.
Στην Αγγλία δεν έχουν no-fault divorce και η New York Times είχε την περασμένη εβδομάδα μια ανταπόκριση από την Αγγλία με αρκετά τραγελαφικά:
Tuna Again? In Fault-Finding England, It’s a Cause for Divorce
By SARAH LYALL
LONDON — In her 30-odd years as a divorce lawyer, Vanessa Lloyd Platt has heard it all. The woman who sued for divorce because her husband insisted she dress in a Klingon costume and speak to him in Klingon. The man who declared that his wife had maliciously and repeatedly served him his least favorite dish, tuna casserole.
“It’s insane,” Ms. Lloyd Platt said. “These things should not have any part in the procedure.”
But they come up all the time in England, which unlike every state in America does not have a no-fault divorce law.
In one recent case, the husband accused his wife of spitefully tampering with the TV antenna and throwing away his cold cuts. She said he usurped her control of the washing machine and failed to appreciate her revulsion for “intensely farmed meat.”[…]
Under current English law, divorces are granted only under one of five categories, including adultery and abandonment. About half of the cases fall under the heading of a broad category called unreasonable behavior, in which one party has to accuse the other of acting so unreasonably that living together has become intolerable. […]
In addition to the Klingon man, there was a woman who said her husband had not spoken to her for 15 years, communicating only by Post-it note. And there was the man whose wife “would without justification flirt with any builder or tradesman, inappropriately touching them and declaring that she could not stop herself.”
One petition read: “The respondent insisted that his pet tarantula, Timmy, slept in a glass case next to the matrimonial bed,” even though his wife requested “that Timmy sleep elsewhere.”
There were complaints about husbands with atrocious body odor and others who changed the channels too fast. “The respondent husband repeatedly took charge of the remote television controller, endlessly flicking through channels and failing to stop at any channel requested by the petitioner,” one petition read.
[…]
Και τα καλύτερα:
Sometimes, Ms. Lloyd Platt said, it is hard to keep a straight face, as in the case of the petition claiming “the respondent is unreasonably demanding sex every night from the petitioner, which is causing friction between the parties.”
In another moment of unintended hilarity, a client complained that her husband was dressing up in her clothes and “stretching all her best outfits,” Ms. Lloyd Platt said. “When the gentleman came in and he was 6-3 — I found that particularly hard to deal with,” she said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/w...-finding-as-fine-art.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
https://www.google.com/search?q="διαζύγιο χωρίς υπαιτιότητα"
Η περιγραφή στη Wikipedia:
No-fault divorce is a divorce in which the dissolution of a marriage does not require a showing of wrong-doing by either party. Laws providing for no-fault divorce allow a family court or other court to grant a divorce in response to a petition by either party to the marriage, without requiring the petitioner to provide evidence that the respondent has committed a breach of the marital contract. Laws providing for no-fault divorce also often limit the potential legal defenses of a respondent who would prefer to remain married.
Το συναινετικό διαζύγιο είναι divorce by mutual consent ή mutual consent divorce και βλέπω ότι, εκτός από εμάς, το έχουν οι Ινδοί, τουλάχιστον.
Στην Αγγλία δεν έχουν no-fault divorce και η New York Times είχε την περασμένη εβδομάδα μια ανταπόκριση από την Αγγλία με αρκετά τραγελαφικά:
Tuna Again? In Fault-Finding England, It’s a Cause for Divorce
By SARAH LYALL
LONDON — In her 30-odd years as a divorce lawyer, Vanessa Lloyd Platt has heard it all. The woman who sued for divorce because her husband insisted she dress in a Klingon costume and speak to him in Klingon. The man who declared that his wife had maliciously and repeatedly served him his least favorite dish, tuna casserole.
“It’s insane,” Ms. Lloyd Platt said. “These things should not have any part in the procedure.”
But they come up all the time in England, which unlike every state in America does not have a no-fault divorce law.
In one recent case, the husband accused his wife of spitefully tampering with the TV antenna and throwing away his cold cuts. She said he usurped her control of the washing machine and failed to appreciate her revulsion for “intensely farmed meat.”[…]
Under current English law, divorces are granted only under one of five categories, including adultery and abandonment. About half of the cases fall under the heading of a broad category called unreasonable behavior, in which one party has to accuse the other of acting so unreasonably that living together has become intolerable. […]
In addition to the Klingon man, there was a woman who said her husband had not spoken to her for 15 years, communicating only by Post-it note. And there was the man whose wife “would without justification flirt with any builder or tradesman, inappropriately touching them and declaring that she could not stop herself.”
One petition read: “The respondent insisted that his pet tarantula, Timmy, slept in a glass case next to the matrimonial bed,” even though his wife requested “that Timmy sleep elsewhere.”
There were complaints about husbands with atrocious body odor and others who changed the channels too fast. “The respondent husband repeatedly took charge of the remote television controller, endlessly flicking through channels and failing to stop at any channel requested by the petitioner,” one petition read.
[…]
Και τα καλύτερα:
Sometimes, Ms. Lloyd Platt said, it is hard to keep a straight face, as in the case of the petition claiming “the respondent is unreasonably demanding sex every night from the petitioner, which is causing friction between the parties.”
In another moment of unintended hilarity, a client complained that her husband was dressing up in her clothes and “stretching all her best outfits,” Ms. Lloyd Platt said. “When the gentleman came in and he was 6-3 — I found that particularly hard to deal with,” she said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/w...-finding-as-fine-art.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
